jeang3nie/capsule
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

New tinylog entry

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Nathan Fisher 2023-06-15 00:08:38 -04:00
parent 3906ccf8e4
commit 17f5927697
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
content/tinylog.gmi
View file

@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ Meta(
published: Some(Time( published: Some(Time(
year: 2023, year: 2023,
month: 6, month: 6,
day: 10, day: 15,
hour: 13, hour: 4,
minute: 55, minute: 8,
second: 59, second: 28,
)), )),
tags: [ tags: [
"tinylog", "tinylog",
@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ Meta(
Some shorter thoughts and updates that might not warrant a full gemlog entry. I'll probably be using this to post updates on my various projects in a much more regular fashion. Some shorter thoughts and updates that might not warrant a full gemlog entry. I'll probably be using this to post updates on my various projects in a much more regular fashion.
=> .. Home => .. Home
## 2023-06-15 04:08 UTC
I decided to install FreeBSD on actual hardware again and had some interesting complications. I had a full gemlog post ready to go about it actually, but one of the complications lead to some data loss, so I'll have to put it all back together again.
In other news, I've been forgetting to git commit/push/pull when updating this tinylog and had to clean up a bad merge earlier. No posts should have been lost, which is the great thing about putting it all into VC, but obviously my workflow needs updated.
## 2023-06-10 13:55 UTC ## 2023-06-10 13:55 UTC
The latest Dory commits center around an iso-8601 time implementation, which is the format that `timestamp` lines are supposed to use in messages. The spec is of course a little ambiguous, and iso8601 allows dates in one of three formats, with the further distinction that there is both a `basic` formatting and an `extended` formatting, where the difference is the appearance of separators between the fields. I've decided for expediency to only implement `calendar` style dates, which is the traditional yyyy-mm--dd format that we're all used to seeing. The latest Dory commits center around an iso-8601 time implementation, which is the format that `timestamp` lines are supposed to use in messages. The spec is of course a little ambiguous, and iso8601 allows dates in one of three formats, with the further distinction that there is both a `basic` formatting and an `extended` formatting, where the difference is the appearance of separators between the fields. I've decided for expediency to only implement `calendar` style dates, which is the traditional yyyy-mm--dd format that we're all used to seeing.
## 2023-06-07 20:36 UTC ## 2023-06-07 20:36 UTC